Skip to content

Study note

Energy cost of running instability evaluated with wearable trunk accelerometry.

PMID 28751372 (2018): stride — Running economy (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Feb 23, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 28751372

Energy cost of running instability evaluated with wearable trunk accelerometry.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2018 • DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00429.2017

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: controlled study.
  • Population relevance: mixed/unclear athlete specificity.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

Maintaining stability under dynamic conditions is an inherent challenge to bipedal running. (controlled study; recreational runners).

Effects on Running economy are mixed or unclear from the abstract alone. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Maintaining stability under dynamic conditions is an inherent challenge to bipedal running.
  • Effects on Running economy are mixed or unclear from the abstract alone.
  • Population: recreational runners.
  • Protocol cues: abstract may omit dose/timing; use the full paper to replicate accurately.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: stride.
  • Dose/time/duration: abstract doesn’t include enough detail; use the full paper’s methods section.
  • Outcomes: Running economy.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (recreational runners) working on biomechanics.
  • Athletes who can measure Running economy with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study.
  • Population: recreational runners.
  • Outcomes measured: Running economy.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 28751372 (2018) — Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985).

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Maintaining stability under dynamic conditions is an inherent challenge to bipedal running.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources