Skip to content

Influence of different midsole foam in advanced footwear technology use on running economy and biomechanics in trained runners.

PMID 37858294 (2024): biomechanics — Running economy (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 37858294

Influence of different midsole foam in advanced footwear technology use on running economy and biomechanics in trained runners.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2024 • DOI 10.1111/sms.14526
Evidence C69/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

BACKGROUND: Ethylene and vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyether block amide (PEBA) are recently the most widely used materials for advanced footwear technology (AFT) that has been shown to improve… (randomized trial; trained runners).

The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Running economy under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: BACKGROUND: Ethylene and vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyether block amide (PEBA) are recently the most widely used materials for advanced footwear technology (AFT) that has been shown to improve…
  • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Running economy under the tested conditions.
  • Population: trained runners.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 450 km • 13 km.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: biomechanics (vs comparison group).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 450 km • 13 km.
  • Outcomes: Running economy.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (trained runners) working on biomechanics.
  • Athletes who can measure Running economy with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: randomized trial.
  • Population: trained runners.
  • Comparator: comparison group.
  • Outcomes measured: Running economy.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 450 km • 13 km.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 37858294 (2024) — Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

However, after 450 km of use, the PEBA and EVA shoes had similar RE.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources