Study note • PMID 33691280
Effect of Foot Orthoses on Running Economy and Foot Longitudinal Arch Motion in Runners With Flat-Arched Feet.
How to use this page
This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.
- • Design signal: randomized trial.
- • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
- • Consistency: single-study evidence.
- • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.
ELI5
In plain language
To determine the effect of manipulating foot longitudinal arch motion with different-stiffness foot orthoses on running economy (RE) in runners with flat-arched feet and if changes in arch deformation… (randomized trial; recreational runners).
The abstract suggests a trade-off or negative effect affecting Running economy. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: To determine the effect of manipulating foot longitudinal arch motion with different-stiffness foot orthoses on running economy (RE) in runners with flat-arched feet and if changes in arch deformation…
- • The abstract suggests a trade-off or negative effect affecting Running economy.
- • Population: recreational runners.
- • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 12 km.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: foot, orthoses (vs comparison group).
- • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 12 km.
- • Outcomes: Running economy.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it may help, and who should be cautious
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (recreational runners) working on biomechanics.
- • Athletes who can measure Running economy with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should be cautious
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: randomized trial.
- • Population: recreational runners.
- • Comparator: comparison group.
- • Outcomes measured: Running economy.
- • Protocol cues mentioned: 12 km.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 33691280 (2021) — International journal of sports physiology and performance.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“Compared with standard orthoses, the mean VO2submax was significantly lower in both the flexible orthoses (-0.8 mL.kg-1.min-1, P < .001, d = 0.35) and footwear-only conditions (-1.2 mL.kg-1.min-1, P < .001, d = 0.49).”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations and bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Adaptive AI coach for iPhone
Meet your adaptive AI coach.
Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research summaries for endurance athletes, with study context, practical protocols, and clear limitations.
Biomechanics performance research
Biomechanics changes can help — but most athletes should start with strength, cadence, and pacing.
Running economy research for endurance athletes
Economy is the cost of speed. Small improvements compound over long races.