Skip to content

Study note

Hip muscular strength balance is associated with running economy in recreationally-trained endurance runners.

PMID 30065859 (2018): hip, muscular — Running economy (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 30065859

Hip muscular strength balance is associated with running economy in recreationally-trained endurance runners.

PeerJ2018 • DOI 10.7717/peerj.5219

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: controlled study.
  • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

BACKGROUND: The percentage of sustained maximal oxygen uptake and the running economy are important factors that determine the running success of endurance athletes. (controlled study; trained runners).

The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Running economy under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: BACKGROUND: The percentage of sustained maximal oxygen uptake and the running economy are important factors that determine the running success of endurance athletes.
  • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Running economy under the tested conditions.
  • Population: trained runners.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 0 km • 12 km • 10 km.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: hip, muscular.
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 0 km • 12 km • 10 km.
  • Outcomes: Running economy.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (trained runners) working on biomechanics.
  • Athletes who can measure Running economy with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study.
  • Population: trained runners.
  • Outcomes measured: Running economy.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 0 km • 12 km • 10 km.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 30065859 (2018) — PeerJ.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

The functional balance ratio was significantly and negatively associated with E(c) at 11.0 (r = - 0.43, P = 0.04) and 12.0 km h(-1) (r = - 0.65, P = 0.04) when using a 3% gradient in male runners.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources