Skip to content

Study note

The effectiveness of physiotherapy in patients with asthma: a systematic review of the literature.

PMID 23333065 (2013): inspiratory muscle training, respiratory — Time to exhaustion (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Feb 23, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 23333065

The effectiveness of physiotherapy in patients with asthma: a systematic review of the literature.

Respiratory medicine2013 • DOI 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.12.017

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: systematic review / meta-analysis.
  • Population relevance: mixed/unclear athlete specificity.
  • Consistency: synthesis evidence present.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

Since the introduction of medical therapy for asthma the interest in non-medical treatments deteriorated. (systematic review / meta-analysis; n=9 participants).

In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Time to exhaustion. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Since the introduction of medical therapy for asthma the interest in non-medical treatments deteriorated.
  • In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Time to exhaustion.
  • Population: n=9 participants.
  • Protocol cues: abstract may omit dose/timing; use the full paper to replicate accurately.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: inspiratory muscle training, respiratory.
  • Dose/time/duration: abstract doesn’t include enough detail; use the full paper’s methods section.
  • Outcomes: Time to exhaustion.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (n=9 participants) working on breathing.
  • Athletes who can measure Time to exhaustion with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: systematic review / meta-analysis.
  • Population: n=9 participants.
  • Outcomes measured: Time to exhaustion.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 23333065 (2013) — Respiratory medicine.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

BE (n = 9) may improve disease specific quality of life (QoL), reduce symptoms, hyperventilation, anxiety and depression, lower respiratory rate and medication use.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources