Study note • PMID 23333065
The effectiveness of physiotherapy in patients with asthma: a systematic review of the literature.
Low risk + high feasibility for most athletes.
ELI5
In plain language
Since the introduction of medical therapy for asthma the interest in non-medical treatments deteriorated. (systematic review / meta-analysis; n=9 participants).
In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Time to exhaustion. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: Since the introduction of medical therapy for asthma the interest in non-medical treatments deteriorated.
- • In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Time to exhaustion.
- • Population: n=9 participants.
- • Protocol cues: abstract may omit dose/timing; use the full paper to replicate accurately.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: inspiratory muscle training, respiratory.
- • Dose/time/duration: abstract doesn’t include enough detail; use the full paper’s methods section.
- • Outcomes: Time to exhaustion.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it helps, and who should skip it
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (n=9 participants) working on breathing.
- • Athletes who can measure Time to exhaustion with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should skip
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: systematic review / meta-analysis.
- • Population: n=9 participants.
- • Outcomes measured: Time to exhaustion.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 23333065 (2013) — Respiratory medicine.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“BE (n = 9) may improve disease specific quality of life (QoL), reduce symptoms, hyperventilation, anxiety and depression, lower respiratory rate and medication use.”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations & bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Coaching beta
Get a plan that adapts to your life.
Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research-backed protocols and evidence grades for endurance performance — built for athletes.
Breathing performance research
Breathing interventions can help if they reduce wasted effort and improve tolerance at high work rates.
Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol
Evidence-informed protocol: Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.
Time to exhaustion research for endurance athletes
A lab outcome that can still guide training: it often tracks fatigue resistance.