Skip to content

Ergogenic effects of supplement combinations on endurance performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PMID 40619880 (2025): caffeine, bicarbonate — Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 40619880

Ergogenic effects of supplement combinations on endurance performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2025 • DOI 10.1080/15502783.2025.2524033
Evidence B83/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

BACKGROUND: Supplements such as caffeine and sodium bicarbonate have been found to exert ergogenic effects on endurance performance. (expert consensus / guideline; elite athletes).

Results section: no clear change in Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: BACKGROUND: Supplements such as caffeine and sodium bicarbonate have been found to exert ergogenic effects on endurance performance.
  • Results section: no clear change in Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions.
  • Population: elite athletes.
  • Protocol cues (full paper): 30 minutes.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: caffeine, bicarbonate.
  • Dose/time/duration cues found in the full paper: 30 minutes.
  • Outcomes: Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (elite athletes) working on supplements.
  • Athletes who can measure Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: expert consensus / guideline (randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover).
  • Population: elite athletes.
  • Outcomes measured: Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion.
  • Protocol cues (paper): 30 minutes.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 40619880 (2025) — Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition.

Full paper

What the full paper adds

  • Design features (paper): randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover.
  • Participants (paper): elite athletes.
  • More protocol detail (paper): 30 minutes.
  • Results section: no clear change in Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

The results showed no significant differences for either the isolated (CAF/PLA [CAF+SB studies]: SMD = 0.30, 95% CI [-0.12, 0.73], p = 0.16; SB/PLA: SMD = 0.31, 95% CI [-0.18, 0.80], p = 0.22; CAF/PLA [CAF+BJ studies]: SMD = 0.28, 95% CI [-0.08,…

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources