Study note • PMID 38612966
Ketone Monoester Followed by Carbohydrate Ingestion after Glycogen-Lowering Exercise Does Not Improve Subsequent Endurance Cycle Time Trial Performance.
Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.
ELI5
In plain language
Relative to carbohydrate (CHO) alone, exogenous ketones followed by CHO supplementation during recovery from glycogen-lowering exercise have been shown to increase muscle glycogen resynthesis. (controlled study; recreational participants).
Effects on Time-trial performance are mixed or unclear from the abstract alone. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: Relative to carbohydrate (CHO) alone, exogenous ketones followed by CHO supplementation during recovery from glycogen-lowering exercise have been shown to increase muscle glycogen resynthesis.
- • Effects on Time-trial performance are mixed or unclear from the abstract alone.
- • Population: recreational participants.
- • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 4 h • 2 h • 60 min • 20 km • 20km • 5 km.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: carbohydrate, carb (vs placebo).
- • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 4 h • 2 h • 60 min • 20 km • 20km • 5 km • 5km.
- • Outcomes: Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it helps, and who should skip it
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (recreational participants) working on fueling.
- • Athletes who can measure Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should skip
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: controlled study (placebo-controlled).
- • Population: recreational participants.
- • Comparator: placebo.
- • Outcomes measured: Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation.
- • Protocol cues mentioned: 4 h • 2 h • 60 min • 20 km • 20km • 5 km • 5km.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 38612966 (2024) — Nutrients.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“However, no treatment differences (p > 0.05) in power output nor time to complete either time trial were observed vs.”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations & bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Coaching beta
Get a plan that adapts to your life.
Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research-backed protocols and evidence grades for endurance performance — built for athletes.
Fueling performance research
Fueling is performance, not just health: the right carbs at the right time change outcomes.
Carbohydrate fueling for long runs: a protocol you can practice
Evidence-informed protocol: Carbohydrate fueling for long runs: a protocol you can practice. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.
Time to exhaustion research for endurance athletes
A lab outcome that can still guide training: it often tracks fatigue resistance.
Time-trial performance research for endurance athletes
Practical performance outcome used in many studies: closer to racing than lab-only metrics.