Skip to content

Study note

Similar effects on exercise performance following different respiratory muscle training programs in healthy young men.

PMID 37752180 (2023): respiratory, breathing — Time to exhaustion (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 37752180

Similar effects on exercise performance following different respiratory muscle training programs in healthy young men.

Scientific reports2023 • DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-41580-w

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: controlled study.
  • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

Both respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET) and inspiratory resistive training (IMT) seem to increase whole-body exercise performance, but direct comparisons between the two are scarce. (controlled study; trained participants).

The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Both respiratory muscle endurance training (RMET) and inspiratory resistive training (IMT) seem to increase whole-body exercise performance, but direct comparisons between the two are scarce.
  • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions.
  • Population: trained participants.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 4 weeks.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: respiratory, breathing (vs comparison group).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 4 weeks.
  • Outcomes: Time to exhaustion.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (trained participants) working on breathing.
  • Athletes who can measure Time to exhaustion with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study.
  • Population: trained participants.
  • Comparator: comparison group.
  • Outcomes measured: Time to exhaustion.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 4 weeks.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 37752180 (2023) — Scientific reports.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

SHAM) but only IMT increased inspiratory strength (+ 32%, p < 0.001 vs.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources