Study note • PMID 37449467
The ergogenic effects of acute carbohydrate feeding on endurance performance: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Low risk + high feasibility for most athletes.
ELI5
In plain language
A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the effect of carbohydrate (CHO) intake during exercise and some variables that could moderate this effect on endurance performance. (systematic review / meta-analysis; trained participants).
In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract reports associations involving Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance (not necessarily causation). Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the effect of carbohydrate (CHO) intake during exercise and some variables that could moderate this effect on endurance performance.
- • In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract reports associations involving Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance (not necessarily causation).
- • Population: trained participants.
- • Protocol cues: abstract may omit dose/timing; use the full paper to replicate accurately.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: carbohydrate, carb.
- • Dose/time/duration: abstract doesn’t include enough detail; use the full paper’s methods section.
- • Outcomes: Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it helps, and who should skip it
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (trained participants) working on fueling.
- • Athletes who can measure Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should skip
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: systematic review / meta-analysis (placebo-controlled).
- • Population: trained participants.
- • Outcomes measured: Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 37449467 (2024) — Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“Also, there seems to be a higher effect of CHO intake in lower trained than in higher trained participants.”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations & bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Coaching beta
Get a plan that adapts to your life.
Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research-backed protocols and evidence grades for endurance performance — built for athletes.
Fueling performance research
Fueling is performance, not just health: the right carbs at the right time change outcomes.
Carbohydrate fueling for long runs: a protocol you can practice
Evidence-informed protocol: Carbohydrate fueling for long runs: a protocol you can practice. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.
Time to exhaustion research for endurance athletes
A lab outcome that can still guide training: it often tracks fatigue resistance.
Time-trial performance research for endurance athletes
Practical performance outcome used in many studies: closer to racing than lab-only metrics.