Skip to content

Effects of Caffeine Intake on Endurance Running Performance and Time to Exhaustion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PMID 36615805 (2022): caffeine — Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 36615805

Effects of Caffeine Intake on Endurance Running Performance and Time to Exhaustion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nutrients2022 • DOI 10.3390/nu15010148
Evidence A86/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) is one of the most widely consumed performance-enhancing substances in sport due to its well-established ergogenic effects. (systematic review / meta-analysis; well-trained runners).

Results section: no clear change in Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) is one of the most widely consumed performance-enhancing substances in sport due to its well-established ergogenic effects.
  • Results section: no clear change in Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions.
  • Population: well-trained runners.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 9 mg/kg.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: caffeine.
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 9 mg/kg.
  • Outcomes: Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (well-trained runners) working on supplements.
  • Athletes who can measure Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: systematic review / meta-analysis (randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover).
  • Population: well-trained runners.
  • Outcomes measured: Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 9 mg/kg.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 36615805 (2022) — Nutrients.

Full paper

What the full paper adds

  • Design features (paper): randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover.
  • Participants (paper): well-trained runners.
  • Results section: no clear change in Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

A total of 21 randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis, with caffeine doses ranging between 3 and 9 mg/kg.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources