Study note • PMID 35878109
Resistance Exercise for Improving Running Economy and Running Biomechanics and Decreasing Running-Related Injury Risk: A Narrative Review.
Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.
ELI5
In plain language
It is well-accepted that at least a certain amount of resistance exercise (RE) is recommended for most endurance athletes. (narrative review; n=22 well-trained triathletes).
In this narrative review, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Injury risk. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: It is well-accepted that at least a certain amount of resistance exercise (RE) is recommended for most endurance athletes.
- • In this narrative review, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Injury risk.
- • Population: n=22 well-trained triathletes.
- • Protocol cues (full paper): 8 weeks • 12 weeks • 10 weeks • 6 weeks • 4 weeks • 15 min.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: injury, load.
- • Dose/time/duration cues found in the full paper: 8 weeks • 12 weeks • 10 weeks • 6 weeks • 4 weeks • 15 min • 1 min • 24 h.
- • Outcomes: Injury risk.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it helps, and who should skip it
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (n=22 well-trained triathletes) working on injury risk.
- • Athletes who can measure Injury risk with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should skip
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: narrative review (randomized).
- • Population: n=22 well-trained triathletes.
- • Outcomes measured: Injury risk.
- • Protocol cues (paper): 8 weeks • 12 weeks • 10 weeks • 6 weeks • 4 weeks • 15 min • 1 min • 24 h.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 35878109 (2022) — Sports (Basel, Switzerland).
Full paper
What the full paper adds
- • Design features (paper): randomized.
- • Participants (paper): n=22 well-trained triathletes.
- • More protocol detail (paper): 8 weeks • 12 weeks • 10 weeks • 6 weeks • 4 weeks • 15 min • 1 min • 24 h.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“Lower limb RE may help reduce running-related injury risk, but further evidence is needed.”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations & bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Coaching beta
Get a plan that adapts to your life.
Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research-backed protocols and evidence grades for endurance performance — built for athletes.
Injury risk performance research
Injury risk is mostly about load errors — spikes, monotony, and ignoring pain signals.
Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol
Evidence-informed protocol: Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.
Injury risk research for endurance athletes
Most injury risk comes from load spikes and insufficient tissue tolerance — manage both.