Skip to content

Heat Acclimation with or without Normobaric Hypoxia Exposure Leads to Similar Improvements in Endurance Performance in the Heat.

PMID 35622478 (2022): heat acclimation — Performance in heat, Time-trial performance (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 35622478

Heat Acclimation with or without Normobaric Hypoxia Exposure Leads to Similar Improvements in Endurance Performance in the Heat.

Sports (Basel, Switzerland)2022 • DOI 10.3390/sports10050069
Evidence C60/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

BACKGROUND: Combining the key adaptation of plasma volume (PV) expansion with synergistic physiological effects of other acclimation interventions to maximise endurance performance in the heat has potential. (controlled study; n=7 well-trained triathletes).

Results section: no clear change in Performance in heat, Time-trial performance under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: BACKGROUND: Combining the key adaptation of plasma volume (PV) expansion with synergistic physiological effects of other acclimation interventions to maximise endurance performance in the heat has potential.
  • Results section: no clear change in Performance in heat, Time-trial performance under the tested conditions.
  • Population: n=7 well-trained triathletes.
  • Protocol cues (full paper): 525 mg • 5 days • 2 weeks • 4 days • 7 h • 60 min.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: heat acclimation (vs comparison group).
  • Dose/time/duration cues found in the full paper: 525 mg • 5 days • 2 weeks • 4 days • 7 h • 60 min • 2.5 min • 90 min.
  • Outcomes: Performance in heat, Time-trial performance.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (n=7 well-trained triathletes) working on heat.
  • Athletes who can measure Performance in heat, Time-trial performance with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study.
  • Population: n=7 well-trained triathletes.
  • Comparator: comparison group.
  • Outcomes measured: Performance in heat, Time-trial performance.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 75 min • 15 min • 60 min • 12 h • 2500 m.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 35622478 (2022) — Sports (Basel, Switzerland).

Full paper

What the full paper adds

  • Participants (paper): n=7 well-trained triathletes.
  • More protocol detail (paper): 525 mg • 5 days • 2 weeks • 4 days • 7 h • 60 min • 2.5 min • 90 min.
  • Results section: no clear change in Performance in heat, Time-trial performance under the tested conditions.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Both H and H+NH significantly improved time trial cycling distance by ~5.5% compared to CON, with no difference between environmental exposures.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources