Skip to content

Improved Endurance Running Performance Following Haskap Berry (Lonicera caerulea L.) Ingestion.

PMID 35215430 (2022): improved, endurance — Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 35215430

Improved Endurance Running Performance Following Haskap Berry (Lonicera caerulea L.) Ingestion.

Nutrients2022 • DOI 10.3390/nu14040780
Evidence C66/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

BACKGROUND: Food high in (poly)phenolic compounds, such as anthocyanins, have the potential to improve exercise recovery and exercise performance. (controlled study; recreational runners).

The abstract suggests a positive effect on Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: BACKGROUND: Food high in (poly)phenolic compounds, such as anthocyanins, have the potential to improve exercise recovery and exercise performance.
  • The abstract suggests a positive effect on Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance under the tested conditions.
  • Population: recreational runners.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 5 km • 25 km.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: improved, endurance (vs placebo).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 5 km • 25 km.
  • Outcomes: Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (recreational runners) working on fueling.
  • Athletes who can measure Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study (double-blind, placebo-controlled).
  • Population: recreational runners.
  • Comparator: placebo.
  • Outcomes measured: Time to exhaustion, Time-trial performance, Fat oxidation.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 5 km • 25 km.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 35215430 (2022) — Nutrients.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

There were modest changes in heart rate and V O(2) at submaximal intensities (p < 0.05).

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources