Skip to content

Temperate performance and metabolic adaptations following endurance training performed under environmental heat stress.

PMID 33977674 (2021): heat stress — Performance in heat (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 33977674

Temperate performance and metabolic adaptations following endurance training performed under environmental heat stress.

Physiological reports2021 • DOI 10.14814/phy2.14849
Evidence C60/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

Endurance athletes are frequently exposed to environmental heat stress during training. (controlled study; n=2 elite triathletes).

Results section: no clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Endurance athletes are frequently exposed to environmental heat stress during training.
  • Results section: no clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions.
  • Population: n=2 elite triathletes.
  • Protocol cues (full paper): 20 mg • 47 mg • 5 mg • 25 mg • 2 h • 48 h.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: heat stress (vs comparison group).
  • Dose/time/duration cues found in the full paper: 20 mg • 47 mg • 5 mg • 25 mg • 2 h • 48 h • 24 h • 3 min.
  • Outcomes: Performance in heat.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (n=2 elite triathletes) working on heat.
  • Athletes who can measure Performance in heat with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study (randomized).
  • Population: n=2 elite triathletes.
  • Comparator: comparison group.
  • Outcomes measured: Performance in heat.
  • Protocol cues (paper): 20 mg • 47 mg • 5 mg • 25 mg • 2 h • 48 h • 24 h • 3 min.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 33977674 (2021) — Physiological reports.

Full paper

What the full paper adds

  • Design features (paper): randomized.
  • Participants (paper): n=2 elite triathletes.
  • More protocol detail (paper): 20 mg • 47 mg • 5 mg • 25 mg • 2 h • 48 h • 24 h • 3 min.
  • Results section: no clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Perceived training load was similar between-groups, despite lower power outputs during training in HEAT versus TEMP (p < .05).

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources