Skip to content

Study note

Pre- and Post-Activity Stretching Practices of Collegiate Soccer Coaches in the United State.

PMID 32148642 (2020): stretch, stretching — Injury risk (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 32148642

Pre- and Post-Activity Stretching Practices of Collegiate Soccer Coaches in the United State.

International journal of exercise science2020 • DOI 10.70252/PDCB3344

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: expert consensus / guideline.
  • Population relevance: mixed/unclear athlete specificity.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

Current pre- and post-activity stretching guidelines are designed to optimize performance and reduce injury risk. (expert consensus / guideline; participants).

In this expert consensus / guideline, the abstract reports associations involving Injury risk (not necessarily causation). Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Current pre- and post-activity stretching guidelines are designed to optimize performance and reduce injury risk.
  • In this expert consensus / guideline, the abstract reports associations involving Injury risk (not necessarily causation).
  • Population: participants.
  • Protocol cues: abstract may omit dose/timing; use the full paper to replicate accurately.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: stretch, stretching.
  • Dose/time/duration: abstract doesn’t include enough detail; use the full paper’s methods section.
  • Outcomes: Injury risk.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (participants) working on mobility.
  • Athletes who can measure Injury risk with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: expert consensus / guideline.
  • Population: participants.
  • Outcomes measured: Injury risk.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 32148642 (2020) — International journal of exercise science.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Current pre- and post-activity stretching guidelines are designed to optimize performance and reduce injury risk.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources