Study note • PMID 29373432
Comparison of Sprint Interval and Endurance Training in Team Sport Athletes.
Low risk + high feasibility for most athletes.
ELI5
In plain language
Kelly, DT, Tobin, C, Egan, B, Carren, AM, O'Connor, PL, McCaffrey, N, and Moyna, NM. (randomized trial; n=7 athletes).
The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in VO₂max, Lactate threshold under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: Kelly, DT, Tobin, C, Egan, B, Carren, AM, O'Connor, PL, McCaffrey, N, and Moyna, NM.
- • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in VO₂max, Lactate threshold under the tested conditions.
- • Population: n=7 athletes.
- • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 2 weeks • 11 km.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: aerobic, endurance (vs comparison group).
- • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 2 weeks • 11 km.
- • Outcomes: VO₂max, Lactate threshold.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it helps, and who should skip it
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (n=7 athletes) working on endurance.
- • Athletes who can measure VO₂max, Lactate threshold with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should skip
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: randomized trial.
- • Population: n=7 athletes.
- • Comparator: comparison group.
- • Outcomes measured: VO₂max, Lactate threshold.
- • Protocol cues mentioned: 2 weeks • 11 km.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 29373432 (2018) — Journal of strength and conditioning research.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“Few studies have compared the effects of SIT vs.”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations & bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Coaching beta
Get a plan that adapts to your life.
Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research-backed protocols and evidence grades for endurance performance — built for athletes.
Endurance performance research
Endurance is built by repeatable work you can recover from — not by heroic weeks you can’t sustain.
Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol
Evidence-informed protocol: Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.
VO₂max research for endurance athletes
A ceiling metric: useful, but endurance performance is usually limited by durability and pacing.
Lactate threshold research for endurance athletes
Threshold is 'how fast you can go for a long time' — where most endurance races are decided.