Study note • PMID 28873320
Influence of Rhodiola rosea on the heat acclimation process in young healthy men.
How to use this page
This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.
- • Design signal: controlled study.
- • Population relevance: mixed/unclear athlete specificity.
- • Consistency: single-study evidence.
- • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.
ELI5
In plain language
The adaptogen Rhodiola rosea (RR) may mitigate stress responses and have beneficial effects on endurance capacity (EC) and mental performance. (controlled study; n=10 participants).
The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: The adaptogen Rhodiola rosea (RR) may mitigate stress responses and have beneficial effects on endurance capacity (EC) and mental performance.
- • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions.
- • Population: n=10 participants.
- • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 432 mg • 44.1 min • 59.8 min • 6 km.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: heat acclimation (vs placebo).
- • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 432 mg • 44.1 min • 59.8 min • 6 km.
- • Outcomes: Performance in heat.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it may help, and who should be cautious
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (n=10 participants) working on heat.
- • Athletes who can measure Performance in heat with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should be cautious
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: controlled study (placebo-controlled).
- • Population: n=10 participants.
- • Comparator: placebo.
- • Outcomes measured: Performance in heat.
- • Protocol cues mentioned: 432 mg • 44.1 min • 59.8 min • 6 km.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 28873320 (2018) — Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“However, the magnitude of all these changes was similar (p > 0.05) in the SHR and PLC groups.”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations and bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Adaptive AI coach for iPhone
Meet your adaptive AI coach.
Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research summaries for endurance athletes, with study context, practical protocols, and clear limitations.
Heat performance research
Heat changes pacing, hydration, and fueling — and it can be trained like altitude with fewer logistics.
Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol
Evidence-informed protocol: Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.