Skip to content

Influence of Rhodiola rosea on the heat acclimation process in young healthy men.

PMID 28873320 (2018): heat acclimation — Performance in heat (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 11:13 PM

Study note • PMID 28873320

Influence of Rhodiola rosea on the heat acclimation process in young healthy men.

Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme2018 • DOI 10.1139/apnm-2017-0372
Evidence C56/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

The adaptogen Rhodiola rosea (RR) may mitigate stress responses and have beneficial effects on endurance capacity (EC) and mental performance. (controlled study; n=10 participants).

The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: The adaptogen Rhodiola rosea (RR) may mitigate stress responses and have beneficial effects on endurance capacity (EC) and mental performance.
  • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions.
  • Population: n=10 participants.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 432 mg • 44.1 min • 59.8 min • 6 km.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: heat acclimation (vs placebo).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 432 mg • 44.1 min • 59.8 min • 6 km.
  • Outcomes: Performance in heat.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (n=10 participants) working on heat.
  • Athletes who can measure Performance in heat with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study (placebo-controlled).
  • Population: n=10 participants.
  • Comparator: placebo.
  • Outcomes measured: Performance in heat.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 432 mg • 44.1 min • 59.8 min • 6 km.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 28873320 (2018) — Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

However, the magnitude of all these changes was similar (p > 0.05) in the SHR and PLC groups.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources