Study note • PMID 28301438
Effects of 12-Week Concurrent High-Intensity Interval Strength and Endurance Training Program on Physical Performance in Healthy Older People.
How to use this page
This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.
- • Design signal: randomized trial.
- • Population relevance: mixed/unclear athlete specificity.
- • Consistency: single-study evidence.
- • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.
ELI5
In plain language
Garcia-Pinillos, F, Laredo-Aguilera, JA, Munoz-Jimenez, M, and Latorre-Roman, PA. (randomized trial; n=47 participants).
The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in VO₂max, Lactate threshold under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: Garcia-Pinillos, F, Laredo-Aguilera, JA, Munoz-Jimenez, M, and Latorre-Roman, PA.
- • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in VO₂max, Lactate threshold under the tested conditions.
- • Population: n=47 participants.
- • Protocol cues: abstract may omit dose/timing; use the full paper to replicate accurately.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: endurance, interval (vs control group).
- • Dose/time/duration: abstract doesn’t include enough detail; use the full paper’s methods section.
- • Outcomes: VO₂max, Lactate threshold.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it may help, and who should be cautious
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (n=47 participants) working on endurance.
- • Athletes who can measure VO₂max, Lactate threshold with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should be cautious
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: randomized trial.
- • Population: n=47 participants.
- • Comparator: control group.
- • Outcomes measured: VO₂max, Lactate threshold.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 28301438 (2019) — Journal of strength and conditioning research.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“The time x group interaction revealed no significant between-group differences at pretest (p >/= 0.05).”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations and bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Adaptive AI coach for iPhone
Meet your adaptive AI coach.
Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research summaries for endurance athletes, with study context, practical protocols, and clear limitations.
Endurance performance research
Build endurance with repeatable training, gradual progression, and enough recovery to support the next week.
Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol
Evidence-informed protocol: Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.