Skip to content

Short-term heat acclimation improves the determinants of endurance performance and 5-km running performance in the heat.

PMID 28177747 (2017): heat acclimation, heat stress — Performance in heat (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 11:13 PM

Study note • PMID 28177747

Short-term heat acclimation improves the determinants of endurance performance and 5-km running performance in the heat.

Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme2017 • DOI 10.1139/apnm-2016-0349
Evidence C56/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

This study investigated the effect of 5 days of controlled short-term heat acclimation (STHA) on the determinants of endurance performance and 5-km performance in runners, relative to the impairment… (controlled study; runners).

The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: This study investigated the effect of 5 days of controlled short-term heat acclimation (STHA) on the determinants of endurance performance and 5-km performance in runners, relative to the impairment…
  • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions.
  • Population: runners.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 5 days.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: heat acclimation, heat stress (vs control group).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 5 days.
  • Outcomes: Performance in heat.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (runners) working on heat.
  • Athletes who can measure Performance in heat with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study.
  • Population: runners.
  • Comparator: control group.
  • Outcomes measured: Performance in heat.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 5 days.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 28177747 (2017) — Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Similarly, RE was impaired in the cool GXT, relative to the hot GXT (p = 0.004).

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources