Skip to content

Effect of Permissive Dehydration on Induction and Decay of Heat Acclimation, and Temperate Exercise Performance.

PMID 27932993 (2016): heat acclimation, heat stress — Performance in heat (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 27932993

Effect of Permissive Dehydration on Induction and Decay of Heat Acclimation, and Temperate Exercise Performance.

Frontiers in physiology2016 • DOI 10.3389/fphys.2016.00564
Evidence C66/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

It has been suggested that dehydration is an independent stimulus for heat acclimation (HA), possibly through influencing fluid-regulation mechanisms and increasing plasma volume (PV) expansion. (crossover trial; trained participants).

The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: It has been suggested that dehydration is an independent stimulus for heat acclimation (HA), possibly through influencing fluid-regulation mechanisms and increasing plasma volume (PV) expansion.
  • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Performance in heat under the tested conditions.
  • Population: trained participants.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 5 days • 60 min • 90 min.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: heat acclimation, heat stress (vs comparison group).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 5 days • 60 min • 90 min.
  • Outcomes: Performance in heat.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (trained participants) working on heat.
  • Athletes who can measure Performance in heat with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: crossover trial.
  • Population: trained participants.
  • Comparator: comparison group.
  • Outcomes measured: Performance in heat.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 5 days • 60 min • 90 min.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 27932993 (2016) — Frontiers in physiology.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

During isothermal-strain sessions hypohydration was achieved in HA(De) and euhydration maintained in HA(Eu) [average body mass loss -2.71(0.82)% vs.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources