Study note • PMID 26639734
Effects of balance training on post-sprained ankle joint instability.
Low risk + high feasibility for most athletes.
ELI5
In plain language
To investigate effects of balance exercise training on instable ankle due to the previous ankle sprain injury. (systematic review / meta-analysis; n=380 athletes).
In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract doesn’t find a clear benefit for Injury risk. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: To investigate effects of balance exercise training on instable ankle due to the previous ankle sprain injury.
- • In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract doesn’t find a clear benefit for Injury risk.
- • Population: n=380 athletes.
- • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 2 months • 8 week • 8 weeks • 6 weeks • 30 minutes • 15 minutes.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: stretch, stretching.
- • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 2 months • 8 week • 8 weeks • 6 weeks • 30 minutes • 15 minutes.
- • Outcomes: Injury risk.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it helps, and who should skip it
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (n=380 athletes) working on mobility.
- • Athletes who can measure Injury risk with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should skip
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: systematic review / meta-analysis.
- • Population: n=380 athletes.
- • Outcomes measured: Injury risk.
- • Protocol cues mentioned: 2 months • 8 week • 8 weeks • 6 weeks • 30 minutes • 15 minutes.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 26639734 (2015) — The International journal of risk & safety in medicine.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“Different approaches to balance training provide in general similar improvement for sprained ankle.Implications for future studies:More RCTs on chronic ankle instability are needed with large sample size and use of different intensities of exercises.”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations & bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Coaching beta
Get a plan that adapts to your life.
Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research-backed protocols and evidence grades for endurance performance — built for athletes.
Mobility performance research
Mobility work should be minimal, targeted, and connected to training — not a second sport.
Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol
Evidence-informed protocol: Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.
Injury risk research for endurance athletes
Most injury risk comes from load spikes and insufficient tissue tolerance — manage both.