Skip to content

Consensus recommendations on training and competing in the heat.

PMID 26069301 (2015): consensus, recommendations — Performance in heat (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 26069301

Consensus recommendations on training and competing in the heat.

British journal of sports medicine2015 • DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094915
Evidence C60/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

Exercising in the heat induces thermoregulatory and other physiological strain that can lead to impairments in endurance exercise capacity. (expert consensus / guideline; n=70 well-trained cyclists).

In this expert consensus / guideline, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Performance in heat. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Exercising in the heat induces thermoregulatory and other physiological strain that can lead to impairments in endurance exercise capacity.
  • In this expert consensus / guideline, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Performance in heat.
  • Population: n=70 well-trained cyclists.
  • Protocol cues (full paper): 0.4 g/kg • 0.8 g/kg • 2 weeks • 10 days • 4 weeks • 1 week.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: consensus, recommendations.
  • Dose/time/duration cues found in the full paper: 0.4 g/kg • 0.8 g/kg • 2 weeks • 10 days • 4 weeks • 1 week • 100 min • 80 min.
  • Outcomes: Performance in heat.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (n=70 well-trained cyclists) working on heat.
  • Athletes who can measure Performance in heat with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: expert consensus / guideline.
  • Population: n=70 well-trained cyclists.
  • Outcomes measured: Performance in heat.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 2 weeks.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 26069301 (2015) — British journal of sports medicine.

Full paper

What the full paper adds

  • Participants (paper): n=70 well-trained cyclists.
  • More protocol detail (paper): 0.4 g/kg • 0.8 g/kg • 2 weeks • 10 days • 4 weeks • 1 week • 100 min • 80 min.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

The most important intervention one can adopt to reduce physiological strain and optimise performance is to heat acclimatise.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources