Skip to content

Study note

Consensus recommendations on training and competing in the heat.

PMID 26069301 (2015): consensus, recommendations — Performance in heat (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 26069301

Consensus recommendations on training and competing in the heat.

British journal of sports medicine2015 • DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094915

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: expert consensus / guideline.
  • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

Exercising in the heat induces thermoregulatory and other physiological strain that can lead to impairments in endurance exercise capacity. (expert consensus / guideline; athletes).

In this expert consensus / guideline, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Performance in heat. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Exercising in the heat induces thermoregulatory and other physiological strain that can lead to impairments in endurance exercise capacity.
  • In this expert consensus / guideline, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Performance in heat.
  • Population: athletes.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 2 weeks.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: consensus, recommendations.
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 2 weeks.
  • Outcomes: Performance in heat.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (athletes) working on heat.
  • Athletes who can measure Performance in heat with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: expert consensus / guideline.
  • Population: athletes.
  • Outcomes measured: Performance in heat.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 2 weeks.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 26069301 (2015) — British journal of sports medicine.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

The most important intervention one can adopt to reduce physiological strain and optimise performance is to heat acclimatise.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources