Skip to content

Effects of oral sodium supplementation on indices of thermoregulation in trained, endurance athletes.

PMID 25729305 (2015): hydration, fluid — Time to exhaustion, Performance in heat, Cramp risk (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 25729305

Effects of oral sodium supplementation on indices of thermoregulation in trained, endurance athletes.

Journal of sports science & medicine2015
Evidence B74/100
Action 1: Default

Low risk + high feasibility for most athletes.

ELI5

In plain language

Guidelines recommend the consumption of sodium during exercise to replace losses in sweat; however, the effects of sodium on thermoregulation are less clear. (expert consensus / guideline; trained athletes).

In this expert consensus / guideline, the abstract doesn’t find a clear benefit for Time to exhaustion, Performance in heat. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Guidelines recommend the consumption of sodium during exercise to replace losses in sweat; however, the effects of sodium on thermoregulation are less clear.
  • In this expert consensus / guideline, the abstract doesn’t find a clear benefit for Time to exhaustion, Performance in heat.
  • Population: trained athletes.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 1800 mg • 3.88 minutes • 3.61 minutes.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: hydration, fluid.
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 1800 mg • 3.88 minutes • 3.61 minutes.
  • Outcomes: Time to exhaustion, Performance in heat, Cramp risk.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (trained athletes) working on hydration.
  • Athletes who can measure Time to exhaustion, Performance in heat, Cramp risk with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: expert consensus / guideline (double-blind, placebo-controlled).
  • Population: trained athletes.
  • Outcomes measured: Time to exhaustion, Performance in heat, Cramp risk.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 1800 mg • 3.88 minutes • 3.61 minutes.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 25729305 (2015) — Journal of sports science & medicine.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Sweat rate was 1015.53 +/- 239.10 ml.hr(-1) during the SS trial and 1053.60+/-278.24 ml/hr during the PL trial, with no difference between trials (p = 0.459).

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources