Skip to content

Study note

Effects of sprint interval training on VO2max and aerobic exercise performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PMID 23889316 (2013): aerobic, interval — VO₂max, Lactate threshold (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 23889316

Effects of sprint interval training on VO2max and aerobic exercise performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2013 • DOI 10.1111/sms.12092

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: systematic review / meta-analysis.
  • Population relevance: mixed/unclear athlete specificity.
  • Consistency: synthesis evidence present.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

Recently, several studies have examined whether low-volume sprint interval training (SIT) may improve aerobic and metabolic function. (systematic review / meta-analysis; recreational participants).

In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract suggests a positive relationship with VO₂max. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Recently, several studies have examined whether low-volume sprint interval training (SIT) may improve aerobic and metabolic function.
  • In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract suggests a positive relationship with VO₂max.
  • Population: recreational participants.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 8 weeks.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: aerobic, interval.
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 8 weeks.
  • Outcomes: VO₂max, Lactate threshold.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (recreational participants) working on endurance.
  • Athletes who can measure VO₂max, Lactate threshold with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: systematic review / meta-analysis.
  • Population: recreational participants.
  • Outcomes measured: VO₂max, Lactate threshold.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 8 weeks.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 23889316 (2013) — Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Future RCTs on long-term SIT and underlying mechanisms are warranted.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources