Skip to content

Study note

Thermoregulation in elite athletes.

PMID 17053417 (2006): heat stress — Performance in heat (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 17053417

Thermoregulation in elite athletes.

Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2006 • DOI 10.1097/01.mco.0000247475.95026.a5

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: review.
  • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Exercise causes body temperature to rise and the resulting heat stored becomes a factor limiting exercise performance in hot conditions. (review; athletes).

In this review, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Performance in heat. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Exercise causes body temperature to rise and the resulting heat stored becomes a factor limiting exercise performance in hot conditions.
  • In this review, the abstract is mixed or unclear for Performance in heat.
  • Population: athletes.
  • Protocol cues: abstract may omit dose/timing; use the full paper to replicate accurately.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: heat stress.
  • Dose/time/duration: abstract doesn’t include enough detail; use the full paper’s methods section.
  • Outcomes: Performance in heat.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (athletes) working on heat.
  • Athletes who can measure Performance in heat with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: review.
  • Population: athletes.
  • Outcomes measured: Performance in heat.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 17053417 (2006) — Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Loss of heat by evaporative processes leads to hypohydration which itself can eventually impair performance.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources