Skip to content

The effect of caffeine on endurance performance after nonselective beta-adrenergic blockade.

PMID 10694138 (2000): caffeine — Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 10694138

The effect of caffeine on endurance performance after nonselective beta-adrenergic blockade.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise2000 • DOI 10.1097/00005768-200002000-00036
Evidence C69/100
Action 2: Consider

Worth trying if it fits your goal and context.

ELI5

In plain language

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that combined administration of propranolol and caffeine (Pr+C) would increase endurance performance compared with the administration of propranolol alone (Pr) if… (randomized trial; participants).

The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that combined administration of propranolol and caffeine (Pr+C) would increase endurance performance compared with the administration of propranolol alone (Pr) if…
  • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion under the tested conditions.
  • Population: participants.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 5 mg • 20.4 min • 10.8 min • 17.2 min.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: caffeine (vs placebo).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 5 mg • 20.4 min • 10.8 min • 17.2 min.
  • Outcomes: Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (participants) working on supplements.
  • Athletes who can measure Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: randomized trial (double-blind, placebo-controlled).
  • Population: participants.
  • Comparator: placebo.
  • Outcomes measured: Time-trial performance, Time to exhaustion.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 5 mg • 20.4 min • 10.8 min • 17.2 min.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 10694138 (2000) — Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Although there was a clear tendency for an improved performance in the Pr+C trial compared to the Pr trial, this improvement was not associated with increased plasma FFA concentration and/or reduced plasma potassium concentration in the Pr+C compared to the Pr trial.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources