Skip to content

Study note

Effects of jazz dance and concurrent training on physical variables in postmenopausal women.

PMID 40261952 (2025): jazz, dance — Sleep quality, Recovery speed (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 40261952

Effects of jazz dance and concurrent training on physical variables in postmenopausal women.

Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society2025 • DOI 10.1080/13697137.2025.2486052

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: randomized trial.
  • Population relevance: mixed/unclear athlete specificity.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

This study aimed to analyze the effects of jazz dance or concurrent training on the cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), muscle strength and sleep quality of postmenopausal women. (randomized trial; participants).

The abstract suggests a positive effect on Sleep quality under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: This study aimed to analyze the effects of jazz dance or concurrent training on the cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), muscle strength and sleep quality of postmenopausal women.
  • The abstract suggests a positive effect on Sleep quality under the tested conditions.
  • Population: participants.
  • Protocol cues: abstract may omit dose/timing; use the full paper to replicate accurately.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: jazz, dance (vs control group).
  • Dose/time/duration: abstract doesn’t include enough detail; use the full paper’s methods section.
  • Outcomes: Sleep quality, Recovery speed.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (participants) working on sleep.
  • Athletes who can measure Sleep quality, Recovery speed with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: randomized trial.
  • Population: participants.
  • Comparator: control group.
  • Outcomes measured: Sleep quality, Recovery speed.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 40261952 (2025) — Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

CRF showed changes between groups, times and interactions, but the CT group achieved greater gains compared to the JD group.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources