Skip to content

Study note

Sleep, Nutrition, and Injury Risk in Adolescent Athletes: A Narrative Review.

PMID 38140360 (2023): circadian — Sleep quality, Recovery speed (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 38140360

Sleep, Nutrition, and Injury Risk in Adolescent Athletes: A Narrative Review.

Nutrients2023 • DOI 10.3390/nu15245101

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: narrative review.
  • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

This narrative review explores the impact of sleep and nutrition on injury risk in adolescent athletes. (narrative review; athletes).

In this narrative review, the abstract suggests a positive relationship with Sleep quality, Recovery speed. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: This narrative review explores the impact of sleep and nutrition on injury risk in adolescent athletes.
  • In this narrative review, the abstract suggests a positive relationship with Sleep quality, Recovery speed.
  • Population: athletes.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 6.3 h • 10 h.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: circadian.
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 6.3 h • 10 h.
  • Outcomes: Sleep quality, Recovery speed.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (athletes) working on sleep.
  • Athletes who can measure Sleep quality, Recovery speed with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: narrative review.
  • Population: athletes.
  • Outcomes measured: Sleep quality, Recovery speed.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 6.3 h • 10 h.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 38140360 (2023) — Nutrients.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

The literature has suggested that athletes have increased sleep needs compared to those of the general population and thus the standard recommendations may not be sufficient for athletic populations.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources