Study note • PMID 35239468
Effects of caffeine chewing gum supplementation on exercise performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
How to use this page
This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.
- • Design signal: systematic review / meta-analysis.
- • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
- • Consistency: synthesis evidence present.
- • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.
ELI5
In plain language
The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to determine the effect of caffeine gum (Caff-gum) on exercise performance-related outcomes. (systematic review / meta-analysis; n=200 trained athletes).
In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract doesn’t find a clear benefit for Time-trial performance. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to determine the effect of caffeine gum (Caff-gum) on exercise performance-related outcomes.
- • In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract doesn’t find a clear benefit for Time-trial performance.
- • Population: n=200 trained athletes.
- • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 3 mg/kg • 4.26 mg/kg • 15 min • 120 min.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: caffeine.
- • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 3 mg/kg • 4.26 mg/kg • 15 min • 120 min.
- • Outcomes: Time-trial performance.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it may help, and who should be cautious
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (n=200 trained athletes) working on supplements.
- • Athletes who can measure Time-trial performance with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should be cautious
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: systematic review / meta-analysis (placebo-controlled).
- • Population: n=200 trained athletes.
- • Outcomes measured: Time-trial performance.
- • Protocol cues mentioned: 3 mg/kg • 4.26 mg/kg • 15 min • 120 min.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 35239468 (2023) — European journal of sport science.
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“There was a significant overall effect of Caff-gum compared to placebo (SMD = 0.21, 95%CI: 0.10-0.32; p = 0.001).”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations and bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Adaptive AI coach for iPhone
Meet your adaptive AI coach.
Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research summaries for endurance athletes, with study context, practical protocols, and clear limitations.
Supplements performance research
Supplements are optional. Only a few reliably move the needle, and context matters.
Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol
Evidence-informed protocol: Caffeine for endurance performance: a practical protocol. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.