Skip to content

Study note

Dietary Adjustments to Altitude Training in Elite Endurance Athletes; Impact of a Randomized Clinical Trial With Antioxidant-Rich Foods.

PMID 33345095 (2020): altitude — VO₂max, Time-trial performance (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 33345095

Dietary Adjustments to Altitude Training in Elite Endurance Athletes; Impact of a Randomized Clinical Trial With Antioxidant-Rich Foods.

Frontiers in sports and active living2020 • DOI 10.3389/fspor.2020.00106

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: randomized trial.
  • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

We investigated whether athletes adjust their dietary intake according to the IOC's altitude-specific dietary recommendations, and whether an in-between meal intervention with antioxidant-rich foods altered the athletes' dietary composition… (randomized trial; elite athletes).

The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in VO₂max, Time-trial performance under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: We investigated whether athletes adjust their dietary intake according to the IOC's altitude-specific dietary recommendations, and whether an in-between meal intervention with antioxidant-rich foods altered the athletes' dietary composition…
  • The abstract doesn’t indicate a clear change in VO₂max, Time-trial performance under the tested conditions.
  • Population: elite athletes.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 1.8 g/kg • 2.1 g/kg • 3 weeks • 320 m.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: altitude (vs control group).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 1.8 g/kg • 2.1 g/kg • 3 weeks • 320 m.
  • Outcomes: VO₂max, Time-trial performance.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (elite athletes) working on altitude.
  • Athletes who can measure VO₂max, Time-trial performance with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: randomized trial.
  • Population: elite athletes.
  • Comparator: control group.
  • Outcomes measured: VO₂max, Time-trial performance.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 1.8 g/kg • 2.1 g/kg • 3 weeks • 320 m.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 33345095 (2020) — Frontiers in sports and active living.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Carbohydrate intake increased from 6.5 +/- 1.8 g/kg body weight (BW) (50 E%) to 9.3 +/- 2.1 g/kg BW (53 E%) (p < 0.001), with no difference between the antioxidant and control group.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources