Skip to content

Study note

Endothelial Vasodilation After a High-Volume Training Load and Tapered Training in Collegiate Female Swimmers.

PMID 30102683 (2021): taper — Time-trial performance (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 30102683

Endothelial Vasodilation After a High-Volume Training Load and Tapered Training in Collegiate Female Swimmers.

Journal of strength and conditioning research2021 • DOI 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002769

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: controlled study.
  • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

Weihl, FM and Van Guilder, GP. (controlled study; n=8 athletes).

The abstract suggests a positive effect on Time-trial performance under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Weihl, FM and Van Guilder, GP.
  • The abstract suggests a positive effect on Time-trial performance under the tested conditions.
  • Population: n=8 athletes.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 4 weeks • 3 weeks • 5 minutes • 120 minutes • 60 minutes • 000 minutes.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: taper (vs comparison group).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 4 weeks • 3 weeks • 5 minutes • 120 minutes • 60 minutes • 000 minutes.
  • Outcomes: Time-trial performance.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (n=8 athletes) working on tapering.
  • Athletes who can measure Time-trial performance with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study.
  • Population: n=8 athletes.
  • Comparator: comparison group.
  • Outcomes measured: Time-trial performance.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 4 weeks • 3 weeks • 5 minutes • 120 minutes • 60 minutes • 000 minutes.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 30102683 (2021) — Journal of strength and conditioning research.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

However, after tapered training, the reactive hyperemia index was approximately 33% higher (2.29 +/- 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98-2.60, p = 0.0223 vs.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources