Study note • PMID 29352373
Sleep Interventions Designed to Improve Athletic Performance and Recovery: A Systematic Review of Current Approaches.
How to use this page
This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.
- • Design signal: systematic review / meta-analysis.
- • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
- • Consistency: synthesis evidence present.
- • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.
ELI5
In plain language
The present systematic review aimed to summarize and evaluate sleep intervention studies targeting subsequent performance and recovery in competitive athletes. (systematic review / meta-analysis; n=218 athletes).
In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract reports associations involving Sleep quality, Recovery speed (not necessarily causation). Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.
Takeaways
What the abstract suggests
- • Study question: The present systematic review aimed to summarize and evaluate sleep intervention studies targeting subsequent performance and recovery in competitive athletes.
- • In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract reports associations involving Sleep quality, Recovery speed (not necessarily causation).
- • Population: n=218 athletes.
- • Protocol cues: abstract may omit dose/timing; use the full paper to replicate accurately.
Protocol
Protocol (as reported)
- • Intervention/exposure: sleep extension, nap.
- • Dose/time/duration: abstract doesn’t include enough detail; use the full paper’s methods section.
- • Outcomes: Sleep quality, Recovery speed.
- • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.
Fit
Who it may help, and who should be cautious
Who it helps
- • Athletes similar to the study population (n=218 athletes) working on sleep.
- • Athletes who can measure Sleep quality, Recovery speed with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.
Who should be cautious
- • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
- • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.
Methods
What the study actually did
- • Design: systematic review / meta-analysis.
- • Population: n=218 athletes.
- • Outcomes measured: Sleep quality, Recovery speed.
- • Source: PubMed PMID 29352373 (2018) — Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.).
Results excerpt
What the abstract reports
“Evidence suggests that sleep extension had the most beneficial effects on subsequent performance.”
Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.
Limits
Limitations and bias
- • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
- • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
- • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
- • This is performance information, not medical advice.
Adaptive AI coach for iPhone
Meet your adaptive AI coach.
Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.
Keep going
Performance Science Lab
Research summaries for endurance athletes, with study context, practical protocols, and clear limitations.
Sleep performance research
Sleep affects recovery, alertness, and training quality. Start with routines you can repeat and judge trends over time.
Sleep extension for athletes: what changes, and how to do it
Evidence-informed protocol: Sleep extension for athletes: what changes, and how to do it. Practical steps, who it helps, and what to watch out for.