Skip to content

Study note

Short-term performance peaking in an elite cross-country mountain biker.

PMID 27476525 (2017): taper, tapering — Time-trial performance (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 27476525

Short-term performance peaking in an elite cross-country mountain biker.

Journal of sports sciences2017 • DOI 10.1080/02640414.2016.1215503

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: controlled study.
  • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
  • Consistency: single-study evidence.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

Endurance athletes usually achieve performance peaks with 2-4 weeks of overload training followed by 1-3weeks of tapering. (controlled study; elite athletes).

Effects on Time-trial performance are mixed or unclear from the abstract alone. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Endurance athletes usually achieve performance peaks with 2-4 weeks of overload training followed by 1-3weeks of tapering.
  • Effects on Time-trial performance are mixed or unclear from the abstract alone.
  • Population: elite athletes.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 4 weeks • 3weeks.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: taper, tapering.
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 4 weeks • 3weeks.
  • Outcomes: Time-trial performance.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (elite athletes) working on tapering.
  • Athletes who can measure Time-trial performance with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: controlled study.
  • Population: elite athletes.
  • Outcomes measured: Time-trial performance.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 4 weeks • 3weeks.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 27476525 (2017) — Journal of sports sciences.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

Other baseline measurements were reduced by 3-7%.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources