Skip to content

Endurance and sprint benefits of high-intensity and supramaximal interval training.

PMID 23679147 (2013): endurance, interval — VO₂max, Lactate threshold (study note for endurance athletes).

Last updated/Feb 23, 2026, 10:34 PM

Study note • PMID 23679147

Endurance and sprint benefits of high-intensity and supramaximal interval training.

European journal of sport science2013 • DOI 10.1080/17461391.2011.606844
Evidence B71/100
Action 1: Default

Low risk + high feasibility for most athletes.

ELI5

In plain language

This study examined the effect of two different interval training programs-high-intensity interval training (HIT) and supramaximal interval training (SMIT)-on measures of sprint and endurance performance. (randomized trial; n=32 trained participants).

The abstract suggests a positive effect on VO₂max, Lactate threshold under the tested conditions. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: This study examined the effect of two different interval training programs-high-intensity interval training (HIT) and supramaximal interval training (SMIT)-on measures of sprint and endurance performance.
  • The abstract suggests a positive effect on VO₂max, Lactate threshold under the tested conditions.
  • Population: n=32 trained participants.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 4 min • 30 min • 3000 m • 40 m.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: endurance, interval (vs control group).
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 4 min • 30 min • 3000 m • 40 m.
  • Outcomes: VO₂max, Lactate threshold.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it helps, and who should skip it

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (n=32 trained participants) working on endurance.
  • Athletes who can measure VO₂max, Lactate threshold with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should skip

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: randomized trial.
  • Population: n=32 trained participants.
  • Comparator: control group.
  • Outcomes measured: VO₂max, Lactate threshold.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 4 min • 30 min • 3000 m • 40 m.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 23679147 (2013) — European journal of sport science.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

When time to complete each test were compared among groups: (i) improvements in 3000 m time trial performance were greater following SMIT than continuous running, and (ii) improvements in 40 m sprint and RSA performance were greater following SMIT than HIT and continuous running.

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations & bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Single studies often don’t generalize to your event, history, and training load; treat results as a starting point.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Coaching beta

Get a plan that adapts to your life.

Join the 26weeks.ai TestFlight beta for adaptive coaching, recovery-aware adjustments, and race-week reminders.

Keep going

Sources