Skip to content

Study note

Cooling and performance recovery of trained athletes: a meta-analytical review.

PMID 23434565 (2013): recovery — Recovery speed (study note for endurance athletes).

Updated Jul 22, 2026

Read the study note

Study note • PMID 23434565

Cooling and performance recovery of trained athletes: a meta-analytical review.

International journal of sports physiology and performance2013 • DOI 10.1123/ijspp.8.3.227

How to use this page

This note summarizes one study record. Check the participants, methods, results, and limitations before applying it to training.

  • Design signal: systematic review / meta-analysis.
  • Population relevance: athlete/trained context.
  • Consistency: synthesis evidence present.
  • Practical recommendation depends on tolerance, context, and whether it protects training consistency.

ELI5

In plain language

Cooling after exercise has been investigated as a method to improve recovery during intensive training or competition periods. (systematic review / meta-analysis; trained athletes).

In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract suggests a positive relationship with Recovery speed. Treat this as a signal, not a guarantee; confirm methods and context in the full paper.

Takeaways

What the abstract suggests

  • Study question: Cooling after exercise has been investigated as a method to improve recovery during intensive training or competition periods.
  • In this systematic review / meta-analysis, the abstract suggests a positive relationship with Recovery speed.
  • Population: trained athletes.
  • Protocol cues (title/abstract): 96 h.

Protocol

Protocol (as reported)

  • Intervention/exposure: recovery.
  • Dose/time/duration cues in abstract/title: 96 h.
  • Outcomes: Recovery speed.
  • Replication note: abstracts often omit adherence and timing; confirm details before changing training or supplementation.

Fit

Who it may help, and who should be cautious

Who it helps

  • Athletes similar to the study population (trained athletes) working on recovery.
  • Athletes who can measure Recovery speed with a repeatable workout or time-trial effort.

Who should be cautious

  • If you have symptoms or conditions that make the intervention risky, get professional guidance.
  • If you’re near race day and can’t safely test, defer the experiment.

Methods

What the study actually did

  • Design: systematic review / meta-analysis.
  • Population: trained athletes.
  • Outcomes measured: Recovery speed.
  • Protocol cues mentioned: 96 h.
  • Source: PubMed PMID 23434565 (2013) — International journal of sports physiology and performance.

Results excerpt

What the abstract reports

In summary, the average effects of cooling on recovery of trained athletes were rather small (2.4%, g = 0.28).

Note: excerpts are short; for full context, read the paper.

Limits

Limitations and bias

  • Abstract-only summaries can miss critical details (population, protocol, adherence, and context).
  • Reviews and consensus statements mix protocols and populations; recommendations may not match your exact constraints.
  • If your context differs (elite vs recreational; cycling vs running), adjust expectations and be conservative.
  • This is performance information, not medical advice.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

Keep going

Sources