Skip to content

Free training tool

Running race-time predictor with honest uncertainty

Estimate an equivalent race-time range from a recent performance, then adjust for distance gap, terrain, weather and training specificity.

Updated Oct 17, 2026

Loading race time predictor…

Example presets

Prefill with a realistic scenario

Pick an example to prefill the calculator, then tweak inputs for your own training week.

Tool

What you enter and what you get

Enter a few details to get your result. The guide below explains how to use it.

You enter

  • • Known distance (5K/10K/HM/Marathon)
  • • Known time (hh:mm:ss)
  • • Fatigue factor (exponent) (optional)

You get

  • • Predicted times table
  • • Predicted paces (per km/mile)

Treat the prediction as a scenario with assumptions

A running race-time predictor extends one performance to another distance using a mathematical relationship. It does not observe your durability, course, weather, health, pacing, or fueling. The output is therefore a planning range to test, not a promised finish time.

Worked example: a 50-minute 10K

The model uses target time = known time × (target distance ÷ known distance)^exponent. With 50 minutes for 10 km and exponent 1.06, the half-marathon output is about 1:50:19 and the marathon output about 3:50:01. These are arithmetic projections, not evidence that the runner has trained for either distance.

A larger exponent predicts more slowing as distance increases. Do not tune it simply to obtain a desired goal; compare assumptions with recent representative performances and distance-specific preparation.

Decide whether the input race is comparable

Input checkMore usefulLess useful
Effortrecent, hard, and honestly measuredcontrolled workout or interrupted run
Coursemeasured and reasonably comparablesteep trail used to predict flat road
Conditionsrecorded and ordinary enough to interpretextreme heat, wind, or altitude
Distance transfernearby distance with relevant enduranceshort sprint projected to an ultra
Recoverynormal health and functionillness, injury, or major fatigue

The Riegel model was developed from performance records and assumes that speed declines with distance. The exponent is not a personal physiological constant. Change it only when you understand why, and show several scenarios rather than tuning it until it produces the desired answer.

Build a prediction range

Run the calculator with a conservative, central, and stretch assumption. Compare those results with recent long runs, pacing stability, weekly consistency, and race-specific practice. For a marathon, a strong half marathon cannot substitute for late-run durability or fueling. For a 100K, a road result cannot encode trail surface, climbing, darkness, or aid-station time.

Use the marathon pacing guide, half-marathon pacing plan, and ultra cutoff planner to convert the scenario into event-specific decisions.

Safety boundary

Do not use a predicted time to race through chest pain, fainting, severe breathing difficulty, illness, or pain that changes normal movement. This calculator is educational and not medical advice, readiness clearance, or a guarantee.

Assumptions

What this tool assumes

  • • Your known result reflects current fitness (recent and executed well).
  • • Conditions and course difficulty are broadly comparable across distances.

Limitations

When this estimate may be less reliable

  • • Longer races require durability + fueling; many runners slow more than the model predicts without specific training.
  • • Does not adjust for heat, hills, wind, altitude, or course difficulty.

Adaptive AI coach for iPhone

Meet your adaptive AI coach.

Tell your coach what you are training for. It builds the plan, follows the work you complete, and adapts upcoming training when recovery, your schedule, or real life changes.

FAQs

How accurate is a running race-time predictor?

Accuracy varies with the input race, distance gap, course, conditions, training specificity and individual durability.

Which recent race should I enter?

Use the most recent representative performance from a distance reasonably close to the target.

Should I pace directly from the predicted time?

Use a range plus course and weather evidence; the centre prediction is not an opening-pace command.

Your path

Choose the finish line

The decision this page helps you make

Treat the predicted time as a scenario for comparing goals, never as a promised result or proof that the build fits.

Keep going

Sources